Name: ________________________

Critical Learning Standards – Writing

Assignment:                                                          

 

 

Focus

Development/Support

Organization

Language/Conventions

INTEGRATION

CLS:

4

 

ACT: 6

·    Shows a clear understanding of the task

·    Maintains a clear focus on the specific issue or position while providing a relevant context

·    Development of ideas is ample, specific, and logical

·    Elaborates fully on ideas by evaluating the implications, complications, or counter-arguments

·    Organization is clear with ideas logically sequenced

·    Most transitions are sophisticated and smoothly integrated into the composition

·    The introduction and conclusion are effective, clear, and well developed

·    Shows a good command of language

·    Sentences are varied and word choice is varied and precise

·    There are few, if any, errors to distract the reader

Effective skill in responding to assignment

CLS: 3.5

 

ACT: 5

·    Shows a clear understanding of the task

·    Maintains focus on the specific issue or position while providing a broad context

·    Development of ideas is specific and logical

·    Elaborates on ideas by partially evaluating the implications, complications, or counter-arguments

·    Organization, although predictable, is clear with ideas logically sequenced

·    Transitions may be simple and obvious

·    The introduction and conclusion are clear and generally well developed

·    Language is competent

·    Sentences are somewhat varied and word choice is sometimes varied and precise

·    There may be a few errors, but they are rarely distracting

Competent skill in responding to assignment

CLS:

3

 

ACT: 4

·    Shows an understanding of the task

·    Maintains focus on the specific issue or position throughout most of the composition while providing some context

·    Development of ideas is adequate with general statements and some specific support

·    Elaborates on ideas by some evaluation of complexities or counter-arguments

·    Organization is apparent but predictable, with some logical sequencing of ideas

·    Most transitions are simple and obvious

·    The introduction and conclusion are clear and somewhat developed

·    Language is adequate, with some sentence variety and appropriate word choice

·    There may be some distracting errors, but they do not impede understanding

Adequate skill in responding to assignment

CLS: 2.5

 

ACT: 3

·    Some understanding of the task

·    Maintains focus on the general topic, but not necessarily on the specific issue

·    Development of ideas is limited or repetitious with little specific support

·    May acknowledge complexities or counter-arguments, but development is brief or unclear

·    Organization is simple, with weaknesses in logical sequencing

·    Transitions, if used, are simple and obvious

·    The introduction and conclusion are discernable but underdeveloped

·    Language is basic

·    Sentences show a little variety and word choice is appropriate

·    Errors may be distracting and may occasionally impede understanding

Some developing skill in responding to assignment

CLS:

2

 

ACT: 2

·    Weak understanding of the task

·    Some focus on the general topic, but not on the specific issue

·    Development of ideas is thin with general support that may be repetitious or irrelevant

·    Little or no recognition of complexities or counter-arguments

·    Some organizational structure, with some logical grouping of ideas

·    Transitions, if used, may be inappropriate or misleading

·    The introduction and conclusion are discernable but minimal

·    Sentence structure and word choice are usually simple 

·    Errors may be frequently distracting and may sometimes impede understanding

Inconsistent or weak skill in responding to assignment

CLS:

1

 

ACT: 1

·    Shows little or no understanding of the task

·    Little focus on the general topic or the specific issue

·    Development of ideas is minimal

·    May include excessive repetition of ideas

 

·    Little or no organizational structure or logical grouping of ideas

·    Transitions are rarely used

·    The introduction and conclusion are minimal or nonexistent

·    Sentence structure and word choice are simple

·    Errors may be frequently distracting and may significantly impede understanding

Little or no skill in responding to assignment

Note:  CLS: Critical Learning Standard scale of 1-4

           ACT: ACT score (maximum of 12) is based on 2 graders’ scores of 1-6 added together

 

11.06.06